[HTML][HTML] Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer

P Schmid, J Cortes, L Pusztai, H McArthur… - … England Journal of …, 2020 - Mass Medical Soc
P Schmid, J Cortes, L Pusztai, H McArthur, S Kümmel, J Bergh, C Denkert, YH Park, R Hui…
New England Journal of Medicine, 2020Mass Medical Soc
Background Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety
profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer.
Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly
increase the percentage of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer who have a
pathological complete response (defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and negative
nodes) at definitive surgery is unclear. Methods In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned …
Background
Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly increase the percentage of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer who have a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and negative nodes) at definitive surgery is unclear.
Methods
In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with previously untreated stage II or stage III triple-negative breast cancer to receive neoadjuvant therapy with four cycles of pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (784 patients; the pembrolizumab–chemotherapy group) or placebo every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (390 patients; the placebo–chemotherapy group); the two groups then received an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo, and both groups received doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide or epirubicin–cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, the patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles. The primary end points were a pathological complete response at the time of definitive surgery and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population.
Results
At the first interim analysis, among the first 602 patients who underwent randomization, the percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9 to 69.5) in the pembrolizumab–chemotherapy group and 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1 to 58.3) in the placebo–chemotherapy group (estimated treatment difference, 13.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.4 to 21.8; P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 2.7 to 25.0), 58 of 784 patients (7.4%) in the pembrolizumab–chemotherapy group and 46 of 390 patients (11.8%) in the placebo–chemotherapy group had disease progression that precluded definitive surgery, had local or distant recurrence or a second primary tumor, or died from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.93). Across all treatment phases, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 78.0% in the pembrolizumab–chemotherapy group and 73.0% in the placebo–chemotherapy group, including death in 0.4% (3 patients) and 0.3% (1 patient), respectively.
Conclusions
Among patients with early triple-negative breast cancer, the percentage with a pathological complete response was significantly higher among those who received pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy than among those who received placebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme [a subsidiary of Merck]; KEYNOTE-522 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036488.)
The New England Journal Of Medicine